Friday, November 7, 2014

To be enjoyed

I step out of the car and retread the steps from days past
Never missing a beat, placing my foot expertly on the archaic pavement
This path into school has become second nature
Each of the 26 bones pressing firmly into the charred Earth; they are no strangers
To the routine I have done for the past 2 years
A never ending loop
Mechanical and reptilian, swirling around like a serpent
With cold emotionless eyes
As it consumes a meal of 99 cent coffee and 4 hours of sleep
It’s venom puncturing the vessels of life
Convincing me not to be the hero in the strife
And despite my efforts to quell the poison,
I slump down, defeated, and let instinct takeover
Shutting off the higher functions of my grey matter
I drop the mix of creative thinking, letting it splatter
As I jump around in its breathing puddles

Instead I embrace this creature called Routine
Squeezing it deep into my chest, crushing it to powder
Ravenously consuming the crumbs that are left behind
I tell myself that today will be the last time,
I ignore the what life has to offer
I say I will refuse to be a stalker
For rather than admiring it from a distance
I can finally glimpse its true brilliance
But I ask for an extension of one more day
Just one day more, before I turn my attention to you and explore…

But life treads on, showcasing its beauty to an audience who is too tired to be listening
It sighs, letting the curtain fall once more
It has heard the excuses
No longer giving tardies or late arrivals, only worrying about it survival
As it struggles to keep the toxin-infected class interested
This is the umpteenth performance, and the critics are not pleased
And on life goes, its gold quickly fading…
But today, must be different
Today I must step into the light, fighting for what’s right, with all of my might, and refusing to cower back and take flight
Were we not meant to live lives of more substance?
To rise above the pain and swoop below the mundane?
To explore the unknown and accomplish great feats…
Rather than Live die, and then repeat…

So I urge you to take joy in what you have,
Take time to enjoy the leaves of grass
To carve your own path
To take the road less traveled, rather than the wide and easy path
For life was meant to be enjoyed

Sunday, September 7, 2014

The Fallen Utopia

Imagine a world filled with no inequality, corruption, poverty, or war. All of the people in that world would work for the good of those who work for them. Weapons are nowhere to be found, and the poor and destitute do not line up on the streets begging for food. In place of hierarchies lie equalities and communities. Everyone lives equally, and everyone is healthy. But at the same time, imagine a world without color, joy, true family, camaraderie, and free choice. Within this world, love is an obscure term that has no meaning and the joy of music has faded to a diminuendo of decrescendo. Dust covers strange paper bounded by cardboard (once called “books”) and food has become reduced to blanched ailments that only provide what the body needs, with no option of indulgence or variety. Life is simply one mundane cycle after the other, with no excitement or tragedy to make it interesting or meaningful. A group called The Elders assign jobs to the members of this community, giving the assigned no option of change or adjustment.

Enter the world of The Giver, the Phillip Noyce directed film starring Jeff Bridges and Meryl Streep, loosely based off of Lois Lowry’s acclaimed novel. I had the chance to view it a week ago. Spoilers regarding both the film and the novel will be included in this post. Most of the young adult novels that have found their spot on many summer reading lists (The Hunger Games, The Maze Runner, and Divergent among others) mostly rely on a more explicitly dystopian setting and the progression of the plot relies on fast-paced action and brutal battle scenes (not all the time, but most of the time). Such novels display the typical symptoms of a dystopian world: cruel dictators, futuristic technology, a hidden society, and a “chosen one” character. Such symptoms are often found in their cinematic counterparts (The Maze Runner has not yet hit theaters, but from what the trailer tells, it seems to fit the same category). Don’t get me wrong; I admire all of those books, but The Giver is much more slow-paced and docile. The film does not jump out at you with tracker jackers or mechanical Grievers. The body count does not reach that of a bombed District or the massacre of an Abnegation community. Both when I was reading the book and when I was watching the movie, I still had to remind myself that the novel/movie was DYSTOPIAN fiction, not utopian. The initial flaws of The Giver’s world was not so clear. Many of the rules that the community in the film followed seemed quite beneficial to society. Precision of language? In a world where the vernacular of the pedestrian has severely declined and the egregious obscenities that have weeded themselves into modern culture have increased, such an indictment is not an imprudent decision. No touching others in public or PDA? The world could certainly use more restraint in that area as well. No weapons or violence. ‘Nuff said. What could go wrong with these rules? This foundation is solid ground for society to base their lives upon.

But like pulling out staples off of a seemingly smooth floor, or uncovering a nest of house centipedes under a comfy futon, the underbelly of the main character’s (Jonas) “utopian” community has very clear dystopian roots. Color, for example, is all but gone from the world. Both the viewers and the characters live in a world of black and white, both figuratively and physically. The paragon of such a lifestyle is found in an event called “the release.” The young and the old members of the community are killed through lethal injections, both to keep the numbers of the community succinct and manageable, and for usage as punishment. After viewing this scene, I realized that whenever human beings attempt to confront evil, unfortunately they become evil themselves. Jesus was the only human who was able to confront evil and conquer it. I am a Christian and though I have been given a new nature,I will always be in battle with my old nature. I must not lose myself to evil. Instead, I must be lost in God’s grace. I must call upon God and fight for what is right, even if the rest of the world may be against me.

The Chief Elder later confronts the Giver and asks him why he would possibly want to bring pain back into the world. The Giver believes that if given a second chance, humanity can do better. That second chance is Jesus. We are saved and redeemed by Jesus. The Giver states that although humanity gained peace, they lost the beauty of things as well. In our own selfish pursuits, do we often do the same? Too often, we wish to pick and choose the parts of life we want/don’t want. In terms of my Christian faith, I can see that. Will I step into Christian faith with both feet in, or will I sit on the fence of passiveness?

“When people have the freedom to choose, they choose wrong.” says the Chief Elder. And yes, for the conflicts that are going on in the world now, it certainly seems so. Why must human beings make choices that are so destructive? Why did God give us the freedom of choice? For me, this question has been plaguing me for most of my life. If God did not want such things, why let us have free choice? He knew the consequences, so why would he do it? Certainly, I don’t have all the answers. In fact, I haven’t even begun to scratch the surface of such a profound question. But the one thing I do know is that without free choice, genuine love is not possible. Respectively, in 2 Corinthians 3:17 (NIV) it states “Now the Lord is the Spirit, and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is freedom.” So true freedom, is in fact being a slave to Christ, and ridding oneself of any attachment to the world.

Lastly, Job 36: 21 (NIV) states “Beware of turning to evil, which you seem to prefer to affliction.” Rather than going through the pain of working out the good and the bad in life, humanity turned to evil. In confronting evil, they turned evil themselves. But is it possible to have only the good without the bad? Is it possible to have only the bad without the good? The answer is no. At least for now. God is the ultimate victor, but until his second coming, when sin will finally be destroyed forever, the good and the bad will continue to wrestle with one another, in a seemingly never ending battle. But the beauty is that one day, God will come to establish a new heaven and Earth. And for the first time since The Fall, there will be a true utopia.

Wednesday, August 20, 2014

Note to Bus Driver on 82

Dear Bus Driver on 82,

Okay, I’ll admit…
It was...like 12% my fault
14%
26%
49%
Numbers roll across my mind like the words out of my mouth,
As I curse that abomination, that scorn of mankind
With his tussled blue uniform and unkempt hair
With his crusty looking glasses and condemning stare
I hate him

“You kids always listening to your headphones!
You never pay attention to directions
You’re always in your own dimension
I should not be the one telling you what stop to get off at”

How dare he treat me like a typical teenager?
Maybe others can listen to their shallow music and soulless lyrics
But my Ipod is more dignified than that
Whether it’s smooth jazz or gospel choir
I promise to strive for something higher than the low expectations society has placed upon us teens

But you don’t see that
You cut me down before my first word is spoken
You think that I am just “one of those teens”
You make your world built from stereotypes and lies
Your eyes are blinded to the fact that I can be different

You think that we all have to be the same by our physical description
You seem to have a conviction whatever I say, it won’t change your decision
Because whether I am of different race, color, or religion,
You will still see me and define me based off of this one definition
You won’t give me any sympathy or second chance

But while these thoughts cloud my mentality
I’m snapped back to reality, and I see him looking at me still
This time, with a sardonic look
As he waits for me to get off, for I have wasted enough of his time
His eyes roll faster than the wheels of this cursed metal monster

“Devon was the last stop sir!” He shouts
“Maybe if you had paid attention you wouldn’t have these doubts”

I turn, and though I wish to strike him down,
I make no sound, and let my anger fly out
As I unleash the floodgates and empty my mind
Of all my anger and fury

Was I supposed to know that McCormick meant Devon? 
Why must you poke holes into my personal balloon called “directionally challenged”
As the air saps out and my secret is loose
Why must I bear your words and have them flutter like an assassin in my ear and have them stay there, not coming out
Letting the spices of mockery permeate and sit on my head
Did I deserve your cruel words and cruel expression? 
As you beat my confidence to the ground without submission?
You should have known the route...It was not my fault
You spawn of the demon, that’s what you are!
It was just one mistake
Yet like an earthquake, you break down the wall of cordiality that protects me and vent
You’re a sad excuse for a human being
A Hamlet without a his father
Odysseus without his Penelope
Winston without Julia
Marko Palmas without his Ariadne
How can you condemn me before you even get to know me?

Haha well I know who you are!
Your life needs no explanation
Your heart is only filled with evil motivations
So I’ll leave, and never see you again
And while I’ll be a veteran you must begin
To realize what you did wrong

But...what am I doing?
Am I condemning you?
Have I committed the very crime that I have been berating you about all this time?
Now I see that the joke is on me
As I attempt to take revenge
I too swim at the shallow end of the pool
I search for no depth and swim only in comfort, seeking rest

But you too are created in the image of God
You too can receive the gift of redemption through Jesus
And though I’ll probably never see you again, I just want to say sorry
Not just for my cruel words and angry thoughts, but for the fact that I focused on certain spots of you, and made them define you
For not taking into account your history
Feelings
Desires
And struggles
Forgive me, I’ll will be better

Sincerely, 

Zachary Lee

Thursday, August 14, 2014

A deed for a deed...makes you clean?

“Life usually takes more than it gives, but not today. Today life is giving us a chance.”


“To do what?”


“To give a @#$%!”


This exchange takes place between an anthropomorphic raccoon named Rocket, and a human bounty hunter named Star-Lord in the film Guardians of the Galaxy, which I was able to view a few weeks ago. Having learned my lesson from Dawn of the Planet of the Apes, I came into the theater expecting action and adventure, but I also looked for a deeper message amidst the impressive visuals and snappy dialogue. I was not disappointed. Guardians of the Galaxy may not be the deepest or the most moralistic film to hit the cinema, but it did raise one question and challenge one theme that plagues most films today: does one good deed cancel out a lifehood of wrong?


This post will not be a review of the film, but I will be discussing key plot points, so spoilers are to be expected. The guardians themselves (Star-Lord, Gamora, Drax the Destroyer, Rocket Raccoon, and Groot) are flawed. Each member has his or her own twisted sense of moral justice and narcissistic ambitions. Rocket is cynical and selfish, Drax is bellicose and homicidal, Gamora is uncaring and deceptive, Star-Lord is cocky and coarse, and Groot is passive and stoic. Not all of the characters are happy with where they are at, but they are content enough where they do not wish to change their lifestyle. One would never find this bunch of characters hanging with one another.

From left to right: Gamora, Rocket, Star-Lord, Groot, and Drax
Image credit: Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures

However, circumstances thrust “a thief, two thugs, an assassin, and a maniac” together to save the planet Xandar from utter annihilation. All of these characters have lived their lives by their own selfish intentions but now, they have the opportunity to stop a villain and make a positive impact on the universe. Though all of the guardians came from tragic backgrounds, they were able to push their differences aside and unite as a team. With wit, the backing up of the police, and a very large gun, Star-Lord, Gamora, Drax, Rocket, and Groot are able to defeat their enemy and (rightfully?) earn their title as Guardians of the Galaxy.

At the end of the film, Corpsman Dey (a member of the intergalactic police force) tells the Guardians that he will wipe all of the guardians’ criminal records clean, but any crime they commit after that day will be punishable by jail time. Drax and Rocket humorously comment on whether “removing someone’s spine” or “stealing” is illegal, to which a horrified Dey states that those are heinous crimes. Though the scene is meant to evoke laughter, what struck me was whether or not these guardians really learned their lesson from what they went through. Did one act of goodwill make them changed? To quote Paul Asay from Plugged In, have the guardians been redeemed or reformed? Yes they did something heroic by sacrificing themselves and putting their lives on the line to save the world, but have they truly changed? Do those subtle comments by Drax and Rocket reflect the underbelly of the problem: that the guardians are still struggling with their inner demons? Did their one good deed wash their sins away?

Ultimately, God’s action of sending his son to die for us redeems our life of sin. As far as the east is from the west, God forgives us and has forgotten our sin. Though we are redeemed, we must live reformed lives. Now that we have been liberated by a gracious God, we must continually battle with our sinful nature and our new nature. It is our responsibility and duty not to succumb to the temptations of the world. I felt that at the end of the movie, the guardians still had their problems sticking to their sides like urchins. This notion is further supported when Gamora asks Star-Lord what they are to do now that they are free and clean. His answer? “Something good. Something bad. A bit of both?”

In many ways, that quote (as well as the one in the beginning of the post) reflect the film. The guardians have overcome a low point in their lives, but they must be wary that their old nature does not come back to haunt them. As Christians, we too must constantly battle to make sure our old and sinful nature does not overtake our new Godly nature, and even when the battle gets tough, to call upon God. We must take ownership of the responsibility God has placed on us. But at the same time, we must acknowledge that it is hard for people to change. It is only God who can fully transform and change the most wicked of souls. That is the power of the gospel. Our effort to fight the good fight and to finish the race is the response to what God is doing in our lives.

Tuesday, August 12, 2014

The Bugs and the Breeze

My younger brother Jonathan wrote this humorous poem yesterday, while contemplating the horrendous plague, otherwise known as mosquito season. 


I like cheese 
but I really hate bugs and bees
I just wish they would go away like the afternoon breeze
wish they would halt like when a captain says cease
or they could just freeze.
So please, when it comes to the Lees, don't bring no bees fleas or fees. 
All that stuff just gonna make me sneeze and wheeze.
These bugs make me want to give that spray a big squeeze
or burn them all in an oven over 200 degrees.
But still I’d much rather have some piping hot Chinese.
If you deliver I’ll make sure to leave some spare keys.
So lets just have this be a decree,
when I talk you can all just go to your knees,
okay fine maybe not so official, jeez.
Man there are too many cicadas in these trees.
But it’s no different than a debate between Mac or PCs
man you bug lovers are hard to please
Don’t you know these ticks give Lyme disease??
I don’t know about all the Lee’s
but until all the bugs are gone, I’ll never be at ease.

Wednesday, August 6, 2014

IMPROVing self-esteem: Finding comfort in my identity

The following post details an activity that I participated in through the University of Chicago’s Collegiate Scholars Program (or CSP for short). For more information about the program itself, feel free to click the link: https://collegiatescholars.uchicago.edu/

If you were to walk in to room 603 (or 802 for some days) in the Logan Arts Center for the past three Fridays, you may have seen several desks upturned and flipped over, backpacks, shoes, and homework all strewn about the frigid floor, and several students who appeared to be getting stabbed, throwing around an angry cat (like a hot potato), or gently caressing a baby. In short, welcome to Hold the Script: A Short Introduction to Improvisational Theater, a two-hour improv class taught by Alex Morales (the sophomore coordinator of CSP). Improv, according to Alex is “the foundation of most theater. It is acting without any knowledge of what is going to happen next, and without a script to cling to. All actors have some improvisational training.” How did a simple definition, one email, and an enthusiastic teacher turn the Logan Center into such poetic and beautiful chaos? Allow me to explain...

When I first heard of this improv class, I was excited that it would help improve my acting and public speaking skills, but I was also skeptical. I had participated in two elementary school plays prior to this class, so I guess you could say I had “theater experience” but all it amounted to, was memorizing a script. For those plays, I was cast as the Herald in Cinderella and Lazar Wolf in Fiddler on the Roof. If one were to go even further back into my past, they would see that I portrayed a robin, among various other critters in my kindergarten school plays. I had always grown comfortable with a script in my hand, happy that as long as I memorized it, I would never falter or look like a complete fool on stage. There was a natural flow and an aura of assurance that I felt whenever I knew the lines in advance. But to tap into my creative energies? To act but with no script or crutch? To create something entirely new out of thin air? To (gasp) actually go to work without a plan!? Oh the pressure was too much…

But I did have an acting bug, and I wished to become immersed in this form of acting. I had also never met Alex before, and wished to meet him. I walked in for the first session, (30 minutes late!) and began pacing around the room along with everyone else, as Alex told all of us to take a deep breath, and to prepare for what was to come.

(As of now I am trying to write this post on the spot, in the spirit of Improv, so bear with me if my level of vernacular decreases and grammar gets loose.) 

Let me say, that it would take a long time for me to hear the word, “prepare” again. These classes were hands down, super fun and amazing! We would often begin with a short recap of what the previous lessons were (those lessons usually being about defining an important aspect of Improv) but after that, everything was up in the air! From games such as scenes in a hat, party quirks, scene switch, question game, and a plethora of others whose names I forget, I never knew what was coming up next, and always had to be quick and think on my feet. Alex brought in a dynamic and new way of teaching that was less about him, and more about the students. He would constantly ask us about the problems, the solutions, and the ideas for future activities. It was by the second session when I ultimately realized what Improv was about: Improv was ultimately about being comfortable with yourself. While a script is a good thing, it can hinder an actor’s performance and abilities. Actors and actresses can become attached to the script and use it as a crutch, rather than as a tool and amplifier to help make their performances stronger. There were several moments where I was pressured to act in a scene based off of very limited criteria and I would often freeze up, trapped in my world about how to properly execute the act. Then an atomic bomb in the form of Alex’s words would blow up that world to bits, because he would shout “Don’t think! Just let it flow!” I often found that in those moments where I spoke the first thing that came to my mind and did so with passion and fearlessness, that was when I had the most fun and that was when I learned the most. 

Now I don’t think that the lesson to take away is to never plan for anything and just take things as they are. Another lesson could be that even if things don’t go the way as planned, don’t make such a big fuss or a huge deal over it. Rather, just loosen up and tackle the new problems with calmness and maturity. Improv was an eye-opening experience and it was one of the most insightful classes I ever had. I also learned what true camaraderie and companionship meant: it meant acknowledging other ideas and humbly accepting them, rather than continually pressing for your voice. There were a few times where I would want a scene to go a certain way, but my partner would push the scene in a new direction. I could not simply destroy what my partner had done, but instead I had to build and act upon what he or she did. I could help cultivate the seed, but not completely uproot it. This proved to be a challenge, but it was a great way to help me bond with my fellow peers and jokingly laugh and go along at how they took the scene. It was great seeing so many different points of view based off of one criteria. It taught teamwork among other students, something I was not expecting, yet was quite happy about. Alex ultimately stressed how we all had “it” (however that may have applied to all of us) and we should not be afraid of our ideas but instead to simply embrace them. 

But there were also rules to this world that Alex crafted. He asked an intriguing question of “how many numbers are between 1 and 2?” The correct answer? Infinite. When one is faced with criteria, that person has the responsibility to create a world around that criteria (using whichever of the infinite possibilities they have at their disposal) as long as they stay within 1 and 2, and don’t branch off to 3. This realism (within the theater world) was extremely important for teambuilding and communication. One could start a scene with “Hey I like this space station”, but the other person could not respond with “This is not a space station.” There are many ways one could answer the “space station” statement, but all of those answers have to be within the reality of that world, rather than branching off to a separate idea. Alex also taught to channel any energy (whether positive, negative, nervousness, etc.) into every scene. 

Overall, I am glad that I had a chance to participate in the class. Improv ended up being much more than learning how to act without a script. It became a vessel for creativity, and a wake-up call for everyone to be happy with themselves and the ideas they have. It taught the importance of teamwork, and the importance of including every voice. By accepting ideas and letting those diverse streaks of color paint the blank canvas, people in the class were able to create a colorful collage that represented one whole, while highlighting everyone’s special gifts, and even idiosyncrasies. 

While I truly enjoyed my time in the class, the message Alex was conveyed felt incomplete. As a Christian, I am satisfied with who I am because of my identity in Christ, not because I am innately good. Even if everything else in the world may fail me, God’s amazing love and grace will always prevail. This is where I draw my confidence from. Since God made me, and since I am a child of God, I can remain confident in my identity, and do need to feel as though I need to seek approval from the world. 

But I still enjoyed the class, and I hope Alex will continue to teach the class next summer and I can’t wait to implement these skills in the coming school year. 

Wednesday, July 30, 2014

Survival of the Dominant

I just finished reading H.G. Welles The War of the Worlds. The initial premise is that the “high and mighty” planet Earth gets invaded by Martians, who come equipped with colossal war machines, deadly heat rays, and fatal black smoke. Through the course of human retaliation, martian dominion, and the sobering aftermath, the narrator (Welles does not give a name for the character) contemplates what “advancement means” and ponders whether or not humanity, for all of its superior intellect and technology, should ever have the right to rule anything. Wow! Let me just say right off the bat that Welles is a sci-fi and literary master! I never knew one could combine real science and adventure into one enjoyable tale. He instantly earns my respect as one of the greatest sci-fi writers ever, right up there with Ray Bradbury and Kurt Vonnegut. I had heard of The War of the Worlds before, but this summer, I finally had the chance to sit down and read it. I had speculated that this was the “first sci-fi” novel and that many sci-fi themes that find themselves in today’s movies, TV shows, and books originated from this novel (I had also previously just seen Ridley Scott’s Alien so it was interesting to contrast themes from that film with themes of this novel). The imagery that Welles employs is simply fantastic: most of the book is him simply describing what the narrator sees, and letting those actions speak louder than words.


The War of the Worlds is split into two sub-books entitled The Coming of the Martians (book 1) and Earth Under the Martians (book 2). The first sub-book plays out more like a post-apocalyptic sci-fi actioner with moments of human drama in between, while the second book is more thought-provoking and philosophical, as the narrator contemplates life under the omnipotent and powerful men from Mars. Though both books may be different in terms of tone, several recurring themes and ideas are present within both, and that consistency adds clarity to the novel, while the differences give each chapter a fresh feel.


The first of these recurring themes is imagery. The War of the Worlds is very rich with detail from beginning to end. Welles could not simply describe the destruction of the districts Ealing, Richmond, and Wimbledon using any simple adjective. Rather, he compares those places to a martian’s sketchbook where the martians draw with their pen of death, and cause calamity and disorder in the process. In chapter 17 of book 1, Welles writes “Over Ealing, Richmond, and Wimbledon, it would have seemed as though some monstrous pen had flung ink upon the chart. Steadily, incessantly, each blank splash grew and spread, shooting out ramifications, this way and that, now banking itself against rising ground, now pouring swiftly over a crest into a new-found valley, exactly as a gout of ink would spread itself upon blotting-paper.” The action is also very well described, with the battle between 3 alien tripods and the human warship HMS Thunder Child being a climactic and stunning end to the first book. Though Welles’ never makes any explicit comparisons, the reader cannot help but compare the warship Thunder Child to have the ramming power of a rhino, the speed of a jaguar, and the ferocity of a hippopotamus. Animal verbiage is not used, but the motions of the ship give it the aura of a living being, rather than a hunk of metal. The alien tripods are described simply as agile and sleek (almost swan-like) mechanical beasts. These are just a few of the many examples where Welles’ drops the persona of being a writer, and embodies an artistic spirit. Such descriptive vernacular paints The War of the Worlds as a grim, but also very hopeful world. For wherever the destruction of the martians is most felt and  most poignant, the beauty of human companionship and sacrifice is also evident. Welles’ strategy is a double-edged sword: both the ominous as well as the beautiful moments are personified through the highest form through the use of metaphors and similes. Whenever I was reading these contrasts, I would be reminded of Romans 5:20 which says “The law was added so that the trespass might increase. But where sin increased, grace increased all the more.” (NIV) So wherever violence may increase, peace and human bountifulness also increased, showing the importance of human community.

Through the use of Welles’ beautiful description and imagery, Welles surprises his readers with something more thought-provoking and profound: the backwardness of humanity and challenging the definition of progress. Whenever the martians are unleashing their heat ray or black smoke, the narrator often marvels at the weapons’ power, wondering whether animals beneath humans view humans with the same awe and terror. The narrator compares humans to ants, while the martians are the new apex predators. This dominion humbles the narrator as he comes to turn with the “order of nature” and painfully accepts the fact that humans are no longer the top dogs.


While I was at Duke Youth Academy, I heard a lecture given by Dr. Anthea Portier-Young, who spoke about the creation story as a narrative, poem, art, and myth. One interesting point she said was that when God gave humanity “dominion” over the Earth, the Hebrew word dominion (radah) means “not with harshness” and not exploitative. Dominion was instead to be viewed as a custodial ethic and responsibility. When God let humanity dominate over the other species, he gave us a responsibility to use our power to help those who have less or no power. Thus, true dominion is provident and nurturing care. It is not pounding to submission and ruling with an iron fist. It was interesting to see the martians dominion over the people and for the narrator to then in turn wonder about how humans could be better rulers to the critters of the Earth after the martians left. Welles asks whether human beings attempt to enforce a skewed version of dominion over each other, or whether we act as responsible caretakers for the Earth.


But those “dominant” martians are in no way physically intimidating in comparison to the humans. The martians themselves, for all of their mechanical prowess, are simply nothing more than a brain, lungs, tentacles, a heart, and blood vessels. They had seemingly evolved and stripped off all of the unnecessary organs such as the digestive system and entrails. This image of the martians as large heads with a swath of tentacles is a stark contrast from the biologically superior images as thought of today. Even in the novel, the narrator stated in chapter 4, book 1 that “I think everyone expected to see a man emerge (from the alien cylinder)--possibly something a little unlike us terrestrial men, but in all essentials a man. I know I did. But, looking, I presently saw something stirring within the shadow: grayish billowy movements, one above another, and then two luminous disks--like eyes. Then something resembling a little grey snake, about the thickness of a walking stick, coiled up out of the writhing middle, and wriggled in the air towards me--and then another.”

A White Martian
Image credit: DC Comics



The War of the Worlds Martian
Image credit: Les Edwards

This physical aspect of the martians is quite underwhelming from what readers were probably expecting when thinking about the formidable men from mars. Welles displays a thorough understanding of the “survival of the fittest” idea from Darwin’s The Origin of Species and by having his martians scrap off the unnecessary organs and body parts, he does a backward Darwinism. To borrow a quote from the the android Ash from the film Alien,“their (the Aliens) structural perfection matched only by its hostility.” Though Ash was referring to a far more formidable creature (seen below) his quote can be applied to these martian invaders in Welles novel. I

The Xenomorph as seen in Alien vs Predator
Image credit: 20th Century Fox

In a similar way, the narrator also had the chance to learn from his comrades. During the initial invasion of the martians, the narrator befriends an artilleryman. The two get separated but after a few chapters, they join forces again. While in the company of the narrator, the artilleryman ranted about how the martians would enslave all of humanity and breed humans as pets (in the same way we do with dogs). The artilleryman the audaciously claimed that he would be the leader of a resistance that would valiantly fight against the tyranny of the martians. He then exclaimed that he only wanted hard-working and able-bodied men and woman in the resistance and would not “pick up any rubbish that drifts in” (chapter 7, book 2). In order to prepare for such a grand scheme, the narrator and the artilleryman would have to build a lengthy tunnel underground. This tunnel would serve as headquarters for the resistance. The narrator was shocked by these bold words, for he himself was quite soft-spoken, while the artilleryman spoke with such gravitas and passion. Even as a reader, I began to be drawn to the silkiness of the artilleryman’s voice and imagine the adventures the resistance would have. As a scientist, the narrator never got to experience the adrenaline of combat, nor could he have ever considered himself to be “fit enough” to survive in the world. He got a shovel and began digging away at the blood-stained Earth, fantasizing about the possibilities such an adventurous future would hold. But he was quickly disappointed when after a short period of time, the artilleryman refused to work anymore. The artilleryman instead, decided to eat mutton and drink beer. The narrator then realized the hypocrisy of the artilleryman’s words. While the narrator wished for able-bodied men and women who would be willing to work hard, he himself was not a hard worker. Superiority, then was not in the flowery sentences of powerful men but through the humble actions of timid. James 2:26 “As the body without the spirit is dead, so faith without deeds is dead” (NIV). Thus, Welles is directly challenging what humans find “superior” and shows how even the mighty and high Goliaths, can be brought low by the small and fragile Davids. So long as those Davids have heat rays and behemoth machines in place of a rock. 

But even David and the Israelites still needed to fight more battles against the Philistines even after Goliath was defeated. In the same way, even after the aliens left the planet, humans still needed to fight for sanity and morality. During the aftermath, the narrator somberly reflects on how the people of Earth can no longer view themselves as the most superior race in the universe. Humans are not alone in the world; creatures with far more advanced weaponry can come back any time, and smite the Earth. With such a looming fear and threat, everyone is on constant alert. But with alertness, also comes new knowledge. The scientific community has blossomed. The military is attempting to replicate or reverse-engineer the martian technology. As a whole, the narrator observes how humanity has become closer. People do not fear the material things they may lose. They are all more willing to help each other, even if it may cost them. Now here is where the genius of Welles is fully realized. Yes the martians attack was brutal, merciless, barbarous, and left many people dead, but at the same time, humanity has “matured” through this experience. The narrator states that many of the world’s problems that probably would not have been addressed, are now being brought to the spotlight because of the martian attack. In some ways, the martians showed humanity what “needed fixing” and though their methods of doing so were wrong and inhumane, the aftermath is one of the most beautiful moments of the novel. 

In the comic book strip workshop at Duke Youth Academy, the instructor Charlie Baber brought up an interesting notion. He stated that while secular music artists such as Eminem and Macklemore may curse, slander, and maliciously criticize the church, what if God is using them as a way to critique something the church is doing? What if it takes an outside voice to shed light on an area where the church can be improved? Should we immediately disregard such people because they are secular? Or should we humbly take into consideration what is being said? Respectively, Welles asks his readers whether he/she thinks the martians invasion was a good wake-up call to the people of Earth, or whether it was a mindless and immature attack by an outside race. The truth is that God can use anything, from a donkey to a burning bush, to speak truth to his people. We should not immediately accept what a non-christian may say outside the church to be gospel, nor should we immediately shut out their voice. Instead, we as Christians must look to see whether their arguments are based off of scripture. By doing so, we are both listening with a critical ear while accepting their argument. 

The War of the Worlds is dark. It is bleak. It is dreary. The action and brutality is made so blatantly clear that the novel has come under fire many times for its violent content. But nonetheless, I urge all who have the chance to read this novel, to read it. Not just for the action and themes, but maybe God can speak even through a novel such as this. 

Wednesday, July 23, 2014

Dawn of the Planet of the CROG

I would like to give a special thanks and shout out to "Sir" William Posey, my roommate and awesome friend at Duke Youth Academy. He came up with the word CROG, which is an abbreviation for Coming Reign of God. Thanks so much man. Hope you're doing good. #crog

I recently viewed the film Dawn of the Planet of the Apes which was directed by Matt Reeves, and stars Andy Serkis, Gary Oldman, and Jason Clarke. I remember walking into the cineplex thinking that this film would be another sci-fi actioner filled to the brim with CGI, stellar acting, philosophical themes, and loads of ape vs human battles. I speculated that the film might be thought-provoking and have a good moral message (as good as movies go) but would ultimately would fall into generic summer blockbuster territory (I had previously seen Transformers: Age of Extinction and all of the characteristics above applied to THAT film, minus the stellar acting and philosophical themes). But I would soon be proven wrong as Dawn of the Planet of the Apes proved to be more than just a simple cliché message watered down with human drama and wrapped up in PG-13 violence and language. Instead, Dawn proved to be a beautifully crafted and dark tale that drew parallels to problems such as racism (or animalism?), lack of understanding/communication, and ultimately what the consequences of a broken and sinful world looks like if it is without God’s grace and forgiveness. I was a bit disturbed by the intensity and brutality of the film, but I can give praise to the unflinchingly honest look that the director gives to this dystopian and fallen world. 

This post will not be a review of the film, but rather a comparison between the events of the film and the real-life issues that they speak to. As such, for those who are reading this and have not seen the film, I will be venturing into SPOILER territory regarding plot details and the outcome of certain characters. While many films may draw similarities between their fictional world and the current one, what makes Dawn so powerful is the unbiased realism that is shown to all of the film’s characters. The film does not justify for any good character’s questionable actions, nor does it critique the violence of the antagonist, but collectively, the film shows how flawed we are as human beings. I wish the film could have taken one last step and showed how even in our human brokenness and sin, we have a God who is still willing to take us in and help us. Our first step to such a God should be an act of repentance. 


The film takes place in San Francisco, California during the year 2026, but the future is no utopia. Years of war have destroyed the possibilities of running water and working electricity. Everything is in chaos and the unity of mankind has broken. The people live in disarray and fear of the inevitable death that looms over them. Anger and fear are traded in for wisdom and clarity, as rare peaceful moments are shattered by sporadic fits of rage. Seeing a community of people that was once so strong before the Simian flu outbreak is disheartening, and the camera pans to people somberly reflecting on life before the flu. The community in San Fran must number the hundreds if not thousands, but there is no strength in numbers. The people are divided and upset, and it is up to Dreyfus (Gary Oldman’s character) to restore peace. But such a yoke and burden feels heavy upon his aged shoulders and while he initially seeks to find a “peaceful” resolution, like Pontius Pilate, he gives the people what they want and goes to war with the apes, whom most of humanity has blamed for the hellish condition they find themselves in. In contrast, the apes are enjoying a time of great prosperity and countenance. In times of hardship and violence, the ape leader Caesar has been able to build a peaceful society and above all, a family and community of apes who learn to work together. Their unity is a stark contradiction to the disarray of humankind. Caesar’s community shows how even if hardship may burn away at our outside shell, at our core, virtues such as family and love can continue to shine bright. In the same way, if like Job, we find ourselves stripped of everything, we must not curse God but instead cry out to him even more. The metaphorical “flood” or “great calamity” so to speak brings out the worst in human beings. But it should also bring out our best. Even in such hardship, people should be willing to unite despite differences and come before God in full surrendurance.  In a truly touching scene, Dreyfus is shown weeping over a picture of his two sons (both of which had died horribly by the Simian Flu) and for a moment, briefly contemplates the possibility that humans and apes could live together in peaceful coexistence. However, that thought is chucked out the window when he hears an all-too-familiar sound: the battle cry of apes preparing for war against the humans. 

That sound was bellowed by the ape Koba, second in command to Caesar, and one who harbors deep hatred for human beings. He and Caesar act as two sides of the same coin: while ape leader Caesar experienced the joy of being raised by a loving and caring father, the only human interaction Koba ever experienced was when they scientists zapping him with a cattle rod or injecting him with drugs. Koba’s human masters were cruel, sardonic, and macabre which skewered his idea of humanity. He believes that all humans are incessantly prone to evil and sees no goodness in them. He is thirsty for blood and hungry for a chilling and brutal revenge that he can extract. Caesar comes from a much more dignified and privileged position. As a leader, he must understand the privilege that he has and attempt to understand and make peace with those who have sharp differences with his views. In this way, it is important not to stereotype and place labels on anyone. Both Caesar and Koba were blind to each other’s viewpoints and rather than attempting to seek a common ground of understanding, they let the tension between them grow which ultimately escalated into violence and tragedy. Living in America, there is the privilege of diversity but there is also the responsibility of understanding and grace. Rather than writing someone off simply because their views are a certain way, or they are a certain race, it is important to be patient and take the time to listen.


Andy Serkis as Caesar
Image credit: 20th Century Fox

This is further proven when humans nursed Caesar back to health after he was shot by Koba. In that scene, Caesar talks to his son and says “I chose to trust him (Koba) because he is an ape.  I thought ape was better than human. I see how much like we are.” This shows how we must not simply take truths as they are and live complacent lives. We must continually be active, whether that is in ministry or other means.

Toby Kebbell as Koba
Image credit: 20th Century Fox

Furthermore, the scary thing is that Koba genuinely believed he was right in what he was doing. He thought that Caesar was far too soft and caring as a leader, and took it upon himself to kill Caesar and lead the apes to battle with humanity. Koba wished to save the apes while also extracting revenge on the humans. He shrouded the attack on the humans as a righteous act, while his true intentions stemmed from hatred. He claimed that Caesar loved humans much more than his own kin. The ironic thing, is that Koba does not realize that he is transforming into the same human masters he loathed and despised. While he claims love for his brother and sister apes, he is more than willing to sacrifice as many of them as he can in order to make the “evil humans” suffer.In the same way when Malcolm (Jason Clarke) attempts to reason with Dreyfus and tell him to spare the apes and not fight, Dreyfus refuses, strongly believing that his mission was a righteous one and that his actions were meant to “save the human race.” Just as Dreyfus believed in what he was doing was right, many conflicts in today’s world comes from people strongly believing that their views are more superior than others.

Though the film will be in the theaters for quite some time (last I heard it beat out Transformers and is the new “#1 movie in America”) I urge all who go to see it to come at it with a more analytical tone. Dawn of the Planet of the Apes is one of those rare movies that amidst the action, comedies, horror, and animated films that pour through one end of the box office and out the other, it stands as a strong testament to the human condition, and shows us that much more why we need a savior like God. 

Wednesday, July 16, 2014

You only live twice: Stepping into a monastic life of Strategic Intelligence and Ministry

For those of you who missed the Q, the title was a reference to an old James Bond movie, starring Sean Connery. Anyway...

I want to dedicate a post reflecting on my experiences at Duke Youth Academy up in North Carolina, and the Strategic Intelligence camp at Patrick Henry College, up in Virginia. For additional information about both, check out their respective website links:



My attendance at both camps has been the reason for my lack of posting, but I hope to get into a more familiar rhythm for the coming weeks!

As I stepped out of United Airlines Flight 3560, a queer aura of apprehension overwhelmed me. Though the flight barely scratched the 3 hour mark (and I had gotten plenty of sleep) I still felt slightly fazed, as though I could not quite believe that I was in North Carolina, about to spend a week at Duke University, with 25 students who came from all over the nation. As I grabbed my 48.9 pound suitcase (just barely passing weight regulations!) out of the baggage claim conveyor belt and began walking towards two individuals who had DUKE YOUTH ACADEMY plastered at the front of their shirts, a new ambiance came over me. This time, it was one of nervousness and trepidation. This was NOT the first time I had been away from home, and out of state before, but the fact that I would have to leave my comfort zone and be subjected to different Christian denominations and hear new theology was nerve wracking. The numerous strategies that I had practiced to reassure myself had disappeared. I greeted the two individuals warmly (both would be mentors at camp) and I joined the rest of the students who had arrived to Duke via airplane, at a nearby Starbucks. Little did I know that the similar overwhelming feeling I experienced would be replicated throughout my next week at Duke, but rather than a feeling of timidity, it would be a feeling of amazement and wonder at the power, sovereignty, and righteousness of God.

Through Duke Youth Academy’s rigorous “monastic-like” schedule, I challenged my mind in the morning, body in the afternoon, and my spirit at night. Having to wake up at 6:00 every morning was an unpleasant adjustment I had to make, but one that I gradually got used to as the week went on. I also took on a “water challenge”, and attempted to drink nothing but water during my time there (even though the numerous sweet teas, sodas, and juices wished to claim my taste buds). The day would begin with a heavenly breakfast, and immediately after breakfast would be Morning Prayer, which took place at Duke’s chapel. Walking through the colossal behemoth of a building humbled me as I would be reminded about how in the grand scheme of things, my Earthly concerns mattered very little. We would walk in singing In the Lord I’ll be ever thankful and hearing the congregation’s voice echo and resound throughout the stained glass walls would give me goose bumps every time. It was during Morning Prayer where we would sing some fairly old hymns, but all of which quickly became my favorite songs and ones that I currently sing passionately around my home today (much to the chagrin of my younger sibling). Songs such as Standing on the Promises, Siyahamba/We are marching, Jesus in the Morning, They’ll know we are Christians by our love, Go now in peace, Standing in the need of prayer, and Be present at our table lord struck me by their poignant lyrics and brutal honesty about the sinfulness of the human heart, while also emphasizing the omnipotent and mighty power of God, who increases grace wherever sin increases. Prior to camp, I had laughed at hymns, admiring their lyrics while criticizing the lack of a “cool beat” and “soul” that was found in modern contemporary Christian artists such as Lecrae, tobyMac, Mandisa, Natalie Grant, Matthew West, and Chris Tomlin. However, after the first day of Morning Prayer, I was humbled and struck by the power of such hymns. While I still admire the contemporary Christian artists, my admiration has increased for music that sacrifices beat and rhythm for soul and lyrics. Furthermore, I usually do not like to sing out loud, but after my time at Duke, I am not afraid to put my vocal cords to work and sing for God. Once the congregation had finished singing, we were invited to openly state our prayer requests and then meditate silently while the preacher read a few verses of Scripture.

After Morning Prayer, the day would shift to a more academic atmosphere. The “academy” portion of this program was centered on theology, church history, and Christian practices, all of which would be implemented through lectures, Morning Prayer, workshops, and chapel. Every day, I would be taught by special speakers, participate in special workshops, and open my eyes to the new ways I could experience God and use my gifts to serve his kingdom. The lectures (or plenary as it was also called) were taught by top-notch theology professors who spoke about topics ranging from creation, baptism, eschatology, merism, and worship. During this time, I heard familiar topics spun in a different way that I had not heard of before. Since many of the speakers were of different denominations (Catholic, Episcopalian, Anglican, Methodist, and Covenant to name a few) the way they viewed certain topics was much different from my Baptist views and upbringing. For example, one professor compared the Creation story to a great visual narrative epic, and pointed out how poetic God was when he created all our universe. Another speaker brought up the interesting possibility that Heaven would come to humanity when Jesus returns, rather than all of us ascending into heaven. Lastly, a professor stated that Jesus gave up being a creator (or gave up his creator-like powers) to become a creation. This stark contrast tore to the core of my heart as I realized the extent of Jesus’ love for me.

But Duke Youth Academy wasn’t all about work, and no play. Snack, worship workshops (more on that in a bit), lunch, and free time would proceed immediately after lectures in perfect harmony and synchronization, like a tower of Jenga blocks. If I was not studiously writing down notes or singing thousand year-old hymns, you could have found me playing card games (Mao, Spoons, Nerts, War, Egyptian Ratslap, and Mauiii), going to the Duke Divinity School Bookstore to pick up some Blue Devil attire, sleeping in an air-conditioned room, walking around the Duke garden, playing frisbee, going for walks, preparing with the music group for worship service, or talking with friends. Duke’s campus was massive and there was always something fun to do both outside and inside. Free time was only for two hours, but that was more than enough time for me to explore the campus and get to know the people at the camp.

Another important aspect of camp was the worship/living theology workshops. The term “worship” had always been an obscure one for me, for I knew that there were several different components to worship but I had never been given a clear definition. Through the worship workshops I learned that worship, at its heart, is the glorification of the triune God. It is proclaiming who God is, giving thanks, and reflecting. But most importantly it was a pattern in which we should base our lives upon. Worship’s four key components: Gathering, Proclamation, Thanksgiving/Communion, and Sending/Benediction should be the basis in which we should base our Christian walk. Just as important as the worship workshops were the living theology workshops. For these, special guests would speak about how they turned their God-given talents into gifts to serve God. A media anthropologist, comic book artist, and spoken word poet all offered their life stories and showed how they were engaging in ministry work through the use of their gifts. As an aspiring anthropologist, a lover of comic books, and a poet, seeing all of these passions come together was encouraging for me. Marlon Hall, the media anthropologist, went around chronicling the “untold” stories of people in Houston, Texas. He would then make mini documentaries detailing the joys, hardships, and struggles each person went through. Charlie Baber, the comic book artist combined the richness of church history and the idiosyncratic mannerisms of pop culture into a hilarious, witty, and heartwarming comic book strip series entitled The Wesley Bros. Lastly, poet JE transformed his personal adversities and life experiences into beautifully spun poetry that gave me goose bumps every time he spoke.

The last and perhaps the best component of the camp was the evening chapel and the small group reflection time that came after. One of the most exciting components of this was that it was mostly youth led (with the exception of the sermon messages, preparing of the sacraments, and benedictions). I myself was able to play the saxophone for one of the services, read responsive readings, and read a piece of scripture. Other youth performed roles such as singing, playing the piano/guitar/violin/percussion, blessing the congregation with holy tap water and a palm branch, performing poems, lighting candles, and the distributing the elements (bread and grape juice/wine). The other interesting aspect of evening chapel was that each night, we would experience a different denominational style of worship. These ranged from Methodist, World, Episcopalian, and a few others. Because of the diverse church services, I acquired new vernacular such as monastic, acolyte, and sacrament. The services were lively and I was deeply moved each night, reminded at how even with different denominations, the gospel of God was not tarnished. This community showed that despite doctrinal differences, we could still stand united as the church of Christ. However, there was one minor difference that I still hold on to strongly, despite what others may believe: the necessity of having grape juice (instead of real wine) during communion. On the evening of the Episcopalian service, the time came to take communion and I stood up to take the elements. Prior to that night, the communion bread stayed the same but Welch’s grape juice was used as substitute for real wine. Every time I had taken communion, I had always expected it to be grape juice and my taste buds were NOT ready for the real thing of fermented grapes. As soon as I dipped the bread into the purple elixir and popped it in my mouth, my taste buds cringed, my throat clamped up tight, and I almost spat out the whole thing, stunned by the robust and horrendous taste. Luckily, my hand was quicker than my digestive system and I quickly clenched my mouth shut and swallowed the morsels. I guess I could say I truly experienced God in a powerful and unique way. Like...very powerful...

Lastly, I led in a small group by two mentors (Dominique and Jennifer) as well as a mentor intern (Hope). After a long day of theology and fun, this time of peaceful transition and discussion was the most refreshing and fruitful. Dominique, Jennifer, and Hope were great mentors who would always answer any questions I had, talk with me, and pray for what was going on in my life. The students in my group (though we were all initially nervous to speak) were talking nonstop and creating a (peaceful) ruckus within the room. I got to hear the harrowing yet truly beautiful backstories of all the campers and marvel at how God was able to work in many different ways. Above all, this was one of the most important lessons I learned at Duke. Growing up, I used to think that there was only “one way to worship” or “one way to pray” but seeing all of these diverse methods and stories merge to one holistic community reminded me that that is what the body of Christ is like.

I left on Saturday, teary-eyed and dismal that the one-week of residency was over (we would still be able to connect through online methods) but I also left refined through the fires of faith, and eager to use my gifts for the betterment of God when I got back home. But first, I had to go through one last camp...

The rusty pick-up truck moved through the sylvan forest before finally bumping into the front of a large Jefferson monument-like edifice, decked with six giant stone pillars and grand steps that immediately required you to sit down and take a selfie before moving on. As I paid the driver, thanked him for his services, and put my foot (for the first time!) on Virginia soil (or rather, concrete) I could feel the pleasant ambiance shift into one of hostility and insecurity. From now on, every step I made had to be without suspicion. Every conversation, every interaction, and mannerism had to appear natural and above reproach, all of which was meant to hide my true motives. This marked the first day (of five) where my name would be taken from me, my identity stolen, and I would begin a new life, severing all connections with my past self.

To give you some background, I participated in a Strategic Intelligence camp at Patrick Henry College, up in Virginia. For those who do not know, strategic intelligence is the process by which specific types of information important to national security are requested, collected, analyzed and provided to policy makers. For my week at the camp, I would learn the inside and outside of the multiple intelligence agencies that existed and live a life of an intelligence worker. In total, there were probably over 160 students at the camp, a hefty increase from the small group of 26 I was used to at Duke Youth Academy. I (along with the other members in my dorm wing) were physically, mentally, and spiritually challenged during our time there. Some of these activities were in tandem with Duke Youth Academy’s schedule, while other challenges were unique. For example, at Duke, my roommate and I messily left our snacks, repugnant clothes, and shower materials strewn all over the floor whereas at Patrick Henry, each dorm wing had the chance to acquire a cumulative set of points (those with the most points would win the “Party in a Bag”) and such points could be acquired by keeping one’s dorm room clean enough to pass cleaning inspection. I was subjected to the “horrendous” chores of cleaning urinals, scrubbing showers, vacuuming, removing dust, making the bed, and cleaning the sinks. The day began at 6:00 (had adjusted to that time by now) and immediately all members of my dorm wing had to be subjected to the tortures listed above. The day would end at 11:00, and in between, every nook and cranny of time was filled with activities (all of which were engaging and convivial). Intelligence experts ranging from retired air force officers to counterintelligence spy officials gave lively presentations that dealt with topics such as the moral ethics behind the US government, the technology that real-life spies use for missions in the field today, the history of hacking, and the geopolitical mistakes that could have easily been avoided in the Korean War, Vietnam War, and 9/11. In addition to these lectures, members of my team and I would have to respond to simulated threats against the US government using the strategies and skills learned in the lectures. I was surprised at what the real-life side of the intelligence profession looked like and how complex the problems were. Rescuing hostages seized by Syrian officials was not as simple as sending in Seal Team 6, equipping them with military-grade Mossberg 500s and AK-47s, blowing up the bad guys, and establishing peace relations. Rather, it required extensive communication with the Department of Defense and the President’s cabinet. Events that threatened national security could not be solved in a two hour action thriller, but instead had to be carefully thought out and planned. On the final day of the camp, all of the campers took on various roles of the numerous intelligence agencies, and collectively we had to end World War III (The United States, Israel, and Japan vs Russia, Syria, and North Korea), stop a Cyber-attack from China, destroy a biological disease that was sweeping through the nation, and make sure the acting president did not get impeached. All of these things in six days!

However, the crux and underbelly of the camp lay in secret identities. Prior to arrival, I was given a new name and backstory by the campus coordinators: I was now Daniel Barry, a 23 year old college student from Oklahoma City who was interning with the NSA. For that week I would be at camp, I would have to act on that alias the whole time.  I was warned that I needed to develop a complex and believable backstory about myself so I could survive (cue dramatic music) INTERROGATION. Men (and women) in black would often storm in during meal times and pull aside several unsuspecting campers to be interrogated, where the campers would be asked various questions detailing their “identity”. I myself was called by the interrogators one evening during dinner, placed in a dark room with one flickering light, and bombarded with questions designed to make sure I had really researched the NSA and Oklahoma City. The interrogators would ask questions about my address, what the city was like, and a plethora of other questions that I had to be ready to answer on command. It was a (somewhat) scary but also very entertaining and helpful for I got a glimpse as to what real interrogations were like. Campers were also tasked with uncovering as many “real names” of other campers as they could (doing so would earn their team points). The ambiance of competition and fear mixed in with feelings of camaraderie made for an amazing camp experience. To wrap up the action-packed day would be evening chapel. Though the building was much smaller than Duke’s, the close and tight-knit feel gave worship a more personal touch. I was reminded about how even in a profession that requires one to constantly lie, God’s word continues to reign true and as Christians, we must hold on to that truth.


Going to both of these camps, I was extremely humbled at the dedication and passion the counselors and the on-campus staff displayed. I was reminded what it meant to truly serve one's community and to use the God-given gifts one has received to pursue justice and goodness within ones residential area. During this time, I was reminded even as young high school students, it is important that we develop skills such as faith, self-discipline, and restraint before we head off to college. We are called by God to be pioneers and explore the unknown, while spreading his gospel. We must conquer the fear and trepidations that we hold and emerge from the tests of fire and adventure more mature than before. I thank God for my experience at both camps, and can’t wait to see what he has in store for me in the future!